Define the record and review questions
Your matter stages and review standards define which litigation records enter the workflow and which dates, facts, issues, and flags the team needs to evaluate.
Document review
AI document review for lawyers, built around your firm's standards
Nexum helps litigation teams turn mixed records into source-cited chronologies, issue flags, and attorney-reviewed work product without giving up control of what leaves the firm.
We map the litigation record-review path first: which documents enter the matter, which facts and issues need source support, where attorneys review the analysis, and what can move into an export.
How Nexum configures to your firm
Configure the workflow around your firm's standards.
Keep analysis tied to source pages
Classification and extraction produce candidate facts, issues, deadlines, and flags with citations back to the supporting document pages for attorney verification.
Consolidate the review workspace
Chronologies, grouped flags, and matter summaries bring related findings together while preserving the sources an attorney needs to check.
Gate reviewed work product
Attorneys review generated reports and other work product before anything is downloaded, exported, or used outside the review workspace.
Synthetic workflow exampleNo client data
From mixed records to attorney-reviewed work product
This walkthrough shows a litigation record review: the firm supplies the record, Nexum organizes source-cited candidates, and an attorney controls the final work product.
- Stage 1
Inputs
A synthetic claim file combines a complaint, medical records, correspondence, and discovery responses—the mixed record a litigation team needs to understand.
- Stage 2
Processing
Nexum classifies the documents and extracts candidate dates, facts, issues, and defense flags while retaining each source document and page reference.
- Stage 3
Cited outputs
The review workspace organizes a chronology, grouped flags, and a matter summary with page citations back to the supporting records.
- Stage 4
Attorney review
An attorney compares each candidate item with its cited source and decides what belongs in the reviewed record and resulting work product.
- Stage 5
Export control
Generated reports and other outputs stay behind firm review controls. The attorney decides what is ready to download, export, or use outside the firm.
Bring one high-friction document workflow. We will map its inputs, review points, and export controls before configuring the working matter path.
Review your document workflowAttorney review and supervision
Attorneys stay in control.
Nexum assists with classification, extraction, and consolidation. Attorneys compare candidate findings with cited source pages, decide what belongs in the reviewed record, and control what is ready to download, export, or rely on in matter strategy.
FAQ
Questions firms ask before a pilot
How is the document-review workflow configured?
Nexum maps your firm's record types, matter stages, source requirements, attorney review gate, and export controls before configuring the workflow.
What does the workflow example show?
The labeled synthetic example shows a litigation team moving from mixed records to source-cited candidate findings, an attorney review step, and a controlled work-product export. It contains no client data or customer outcome claims.
Is transactional contract review the same workflow?
No. Contract intake, clause review, redlines, and approval packages follow a distinct transactional workflow. This page focuses on litigation record review and links to the transactional matter workbench for contract-specific evaluation.
Can we start with one document workflow?
Yes. Start with one high-friction record-review path. Nexum maps the inputs, candidate outputs, attorney review points, and export controls before configuring the working matter path.
Related
See Nexum around one matter workflow.
Book a walkthrough about your workflow, practice areas, and supervision model. We map the matter path first, then configure document review, drafting, attorney review controls, and matter intelligence around how your team works.